80,000 homeless children

Homeless Rough Sleeper

Homeless Rough Sleeper (Photo credit: Deadly Sirius)

The BBC’s More or Less recently drew attention to an interesting case of shaping reality.  During November and December, the housing and homelessness charity Shelter ran a campaign claiming that 80,000 children would be homeless in the UK for Christmas.  This surprised a lot of people, including the More or Less team, as it is very rare to see a child sleeping rough in British cities.

In fact, this isn’t what Shelter meant.  The 80,000 figure, which derives from government estimates, referred to the number of children belonging to families without their own home and therefore dependent on temporary accommodation arranged by the local authority.  Many of these families are lodged in B&Bs, paid for by the council.  Almost no family with children will  be denied a roof over their heads at any time of the year, let alone in winter.  An anonymous B&B is hardly a great place for any child to spend Christmas, but this reality is a long way from the freezing park bench people might have imagined when hearing that homelessness prediction.

Was the campaign justified?  Many of us automatically take “homeless” to mean living on the streets; we wouldn’t be thinking of carpeted bedrooms, fried breakfasts and hot showers as, horrified by the headline, we reached into our pockets.  Yet a B&B is not a home, and therefore, technically, these kids are “homeless”.  Shelter is being truthful in its assertion… even if a tiny bit misleading.

Donate to Shelter here

Advertisements

One thought on “80,000 homeless children

  1. I take your point, but it’s difficult to think of another word that could accurately summarise the situation. Vulnerably housed? Doesn’t have quite the same impact.

    B&Bs that act as temporary housing don’t provide meals and entire families are often living in one room with no cooking facilities bar a microwave and a kettle. I think a campaign by Shelter to educate the genearal public on the nature of temporary accommodation would be really useful – it’s pretty bleak in the majority of cases.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s