The meaning of destruction

What did this act mean for you?

Statue of Saddam Hussein being toppled in Fird...

Statue of Saddam Hussein being toppled in Firdos Square after the US invasion of Iraq. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

For all our misgivings about the invasion of Iraq, it was surely a moment of relief to see the capture of Baghdad go so smoothly.  Perhaps there was even some satisfaction at the overthrow of a vile dictator, neatly symbolised by the tearing down of his statue.

But for many, the meaning of the act was transformed when one of the US Marines decided to plant the American flag on Saddam’s head.  Gone was the sense of a people liberated; instead, the act now suggested triumphalism, even imperialism.

Cpl. Edward Chin places the U.S. Flag over a s...

Cpl. Edward Chin places the U.S. Flag over a statue of Saddam. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

The crowd fell silent, the Marines understood their mistake, and they moved quickly to replace the American flag with an Iraqi one.  But by then the PR damage was done.  Later allegations that the entire event (excluding the flag debacle) was staged for the cameras by a US psychological operations team presented another, more cynical lens through which to view the act.

After a decade of chaos in Iraq, the meaning evoked by that act has shifted still further.  Now we see hubris — pride just asking for a fall.  The rope around Saddam’s neck has an uncomfortable resonance given the dictator’s subsequent fate.

But the main reason I’ve come back to this 2003 event is a recent encounter with a much older image:

Detail from Joseph-Noël Sylvestre: The Sack of...

Detail from Joseph-Noël Sylvestre: The Sack of Rome by the Barbarians in 410 (Le sac de Rome par les barbares en 410).  (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

The painting is entitled The Sack of Rome by the Barbarians in 410.  The statue represents civilisation under attack; the men tearing it down are, well, barbarians.  The historical context is quite different of course, but the uncanny resemblance does offer still another lens with which to consider the invasion of an ancient city by a bellicose and culturally alien nation.  It may not be a fair comparison, but that isn’t the point.  What’s interesting is how the meaning of an act — the truth as perceived by onlookers everywhere — can change dramatically as a result of the brief flourish of a flag, the impact of later events and allegations, or even a coincidental resemblance to an unrelated image.

Advertisements

One thought on “The meaning of destruction

  1. Greetings! This is my 1st comment here so I just wanted to give a quick shout out and tell you I genuinely enjoy reading through your blog posts. Can you suggest any other blogs/websites/forums that go over the same subjects? Thank you so much!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s